Over the past 24 hours, Ukrainian forces repelled dozens of Russian attacks along key fronts, while Russia launched a massive drone strike on Odesa that caused civilian casualties and knocked out power in the city. Meanwhile, the United States halted military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine in an effort to push Kyiv toward peace talks, and European leaders held emergency discussions on boosting support for Ukraine. The humanitarian situation remains dire: continued shelling of cities has killed and injured civilians, millions remain displaced or without basic services, and the Kremlin signals openness to negotiations even as it blames Kyiv for hindering peace.
Military Situation
Heavy fighting on the front lines. Ukrainian forces report intense combat across multiple sectors of the front. According to Ukraine’s General Staff, on March 4 there were around 97 combat clashes with Russian troops, with the fiercest battles in the “Kursk” direction where roughly 30 enemy attacks were repelled. Russian units attempted assaults in the Kharkiv region (near Vovchansk) and in Donetsk and Luhansk regions, including around Novomykhailivka, Dibrova, Dachne and Toretsk, but all were rebuffed by Ukrainian defenders. No significant territorial changes were recorded during this period – Ukraine’s military held firm defensive lines while inflicting heavy losses on the invaders. Kyiv’s official figures claim that Russia lost about 1,340 soldiers killed in just the last day, bringing the total Russian personnel losses since the invasion to approximately 879,000 (note: these figures have not been independently verified). Ukrainian reports also noted the destruction of several pieces of Russian armored vehicles, artillery and other equipment in the day’s fighting. These numbers underscore the high attrition rate Russia is suffering as brutal frontline combat grinds on without a clear breakthrough for Moscow.
Escalation in drone and missile strikes. Russia has stepped up its use of drones, guided bombs and missiles, intensifying aerial attacks on Ukrainian territory. During March 4 alone, Russian forces carried out around 40 airstrikes, dropping 59 guided aerial bombs (known as KABs) on Ukrainian positions and towns. Then, on the night of March 4–5, the Kremlin launched one of the largest drone barrages of the war: Ukraine’s Air Force reported that a staggering 181 attack drones were launched from multiple directions, including Iranian-designed Shahed loitering munitions. Ukrainian air defenses shot down 115 of these drones over at least nine regions (including Kharkiv, Sumy, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Mykolaiv, Poltava, Kyiv, Chernihiv, Odesa and Cherkasy oblasts). Dozens of other drones disappeared from radars before reaching targets – likely decoys intended to overwhelm Ukraine’s defenses. In addition to drones, the enemy fired several ballistic missiles (Iskander types) from Russia’s Voronezh region and even an S-300 anti-aircraft missile from Kursk region during the assault. This tactic of saturating the skies with drones and precision bombs is straining Ukrainian air defenses and causing damage even as many threats are intercepted. At the same time, Ukraine is bolstering its capabilities with Western-supplied weapons – for example, the first footage of a Ukrainian pilot flying an F-16 fighter jet was released, signaling that modern warplanes will soon enhance Ukraine’s air force. Overall, the situation remains tense: Russian troops continue attempting localized offensives to improve their positions, while the Ukrainian Army stands ready for potential new enemy onslaughts, banking on ever-increasing support in weaponry and intelligence from its partners.
Diplomatic Initiatives and International Support
United States pressure and peace overtures. This period saw dramatic shifts in Washington’s approach to the war. U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration temporarily froze military aid to Ukraine and paused intelligence-sharing, aiming to jump-start a peace process by pressuring Kyiv. On March 5, CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed that the U.S. “paused” the flow of intelligence to Ukraine, saying the move was intended to push President Volodymyr Zelenskyy toward negotiations with Russia. This decision followed an earlier halt of U.S. weapons deliveries after a contentious Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy last week. Analysts note that these actions mark a sharp pivot in U.S. policy – from unwavering support for Ukraine to a hardball strategy linking aid to progress in peace talks.
American officials have indicated the freeze could be temporary. Trump stated that he received a letter from Zelenskyy expressing willingness to come to the negotiating table, and he suggested he would consider restoring support to Kyiv if substantive peace talks get underway. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz said Washington is reviewing all aspects of its cooperation with Ukraine and implied the impasse might be resolved quickly if both sides take confidence-building steps toward peace. These signals suggest Trump is prepared to personally engage in peace efforts: he has claimed to be in “serious discussions” with the Kremlin and that Moscow is giving “strong signals” of readiness for peace. In a speech to Congress, Trump argued that “It’s time to end this senseless war. If you want to end wars you have to talk to both sides.” Despite Washington’s abrupt change in tone, official Kyiv is striving to maintain the relationship: President Zelenskyy publicly emphasized the importance of a “stable and genuine” partnership with the U.S. that can lead to a real end to the war. Separately, Zelenskyy’s chief of staff Andriy Yermak spoke with NSA Mike Waltz and agreed to a U.S.-Ukraine meeting in the near future to continue working on “a just and lasting peace,” indicating diplomatic channels remain open.
European and global reactions. The abrupt U.S. policy shift has alarmed Ukraine’s European allies. European Union leaders scheduled emergency talks within 24 hours to discuss ways to quickly boost their defense spending and aid for Ukraine, after signals from Washington that Europe must shoulder more responsibility for regional security. European countries reiterated their commitment to supporting Kyiv despite the turbulence. Germany, the U.K., France and other NATO states publicly affirmed that their support for Ukraine’s sovereignty remains unwavering, even after news of Zelenskyy’s tense encounter with Trump. EU officials are drawing up plans to ramp up arms contributions and training for Ukrainian troops to compensate for any shortfall from the U.S. In this context, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg (according to Western media reports) reassured that Allies will continue to back Ukraine for “as long as it takes,” though he acknowledged that the rift between Kyiv and Washington poses new challenges.
Major international players outside the West also responded. China voiced support for diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict. At a G20 foreign ministers meeting in South Africa, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing supports “all efforts conducive to peace in Ukraine, including the recent consensus reached between the United States and Russia.” He added that China is willing to continue playing a constructive role in a political settlement of the crisis. Earlier, at the Munich Security Conference, Wang Yi had stressed that all stakeholders in the conflict should be involved in peace talks and noted China views any U.S.-Russia steps toward dialogue positively. Beijing is thus signaling its interest in a peace process and does not want to be left out if Washington and Moscow begin direct discussions on Ukraine. At the same time, other global actors – such as the United Nations – continue to emphasize principles of international law: UN Secretary-General António Guterres (in remarks reported by media) reiterated that Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity must be the foundation of any peace agreement.
Humanitarian Situation
Civilian casualties and destruction. The war continues to exact a heavy toll on Ukraine’s civilian population. Russia’s latest mass drone attack caused significant suffering in Odesa: late on March 4, a wave of Russian drones struck the outskirts of the Black Sea port city, killing a 77-year-old resident who died from shrapnel wounds. The strike triggered large-scale damage to critical infrastructure, leaving parts of Odesa without electricity, water and heating for a second consecutive day. According to Odesa’s regional governor Oleh Kiper, debris from downed drones damaged private houses and ignited fires in outlying districts, and a missile strike destroyed an empty sanatorium building near Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, south of Odesa. This marks the fourth Russian attack on Odesa’s power grid in two weeks – the country’s largest private energy company DTEK reported that another energy facility in the region was hit overnight, further disrupting electricity supply to the area.
Beyond Odesa, Russian shelling persisted in other frontline regions. In the Kherson region, Russian forces bombarded 29 settlements (including the city of Kherson) over the past day. These attacks killed one person in the city (a 55-year-old man) and injured at least six others. In Donetsk oblast, Russian shelling struck the town of Pokrovsk, wounding one civilian. In Kharkiv oblast, a Russian guided glide bomb hit the village of Kozacha Lopan, injuring a 41-year-old man. In total, according to regional authorities, at least two civilians were killed and around eight injured across Ukraine over the past 24 hours due to Russian attacks. These figures are being updated as emergency services continue rescue efforts and damage assessments at the impact sites. Every day of conflict brings new reports of homes, schools, hospitals and infrastructure being damaged or destroyed by Russian strikes, underscoring the war’s devastating impact on ordinary Ukrainians.
Refugees and humanitarian aid. The ongoing violence and destruction continue to drive Ukrainians from their homes. According to the UN, around 6.8 million Ukrainians have become refugees abroad since the full-scale invasion began, seeking safety in countries across Europe and beyond. Millions more are internally displaced within Ukraine, having fled frontline areas to relatively safer regions. Humanitarian needs remain enormous: the UN’s 2025 Humanitarian Response Plan estimates that about 12.7 million people in Ukraine will require humanitarian assistance of various kinds (food, shelter, medical care). International organizations and volunteers are working continuously to deliver aid to the hardest-hit communities. For instance, the Red Cross has distributed thousands of food and winter supply kits in recently liberated towns of Donbas (according to Ukrainian media), and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) is coordinating relief for Ukrainian refugees across Europe. Ukraine’s economy is also suffering under the strain of war: constant attacks on infrastructure lead to power outages and transport disruptions, which hamper industry and daily life. Government estimates indicate a double-digit drop in GDP for 2024, and while a modest rebound is hoped for in 2025 thanks to international financial support, the social situation remains difficult. Unemployment has risen (especially in frontline provinces) and many families rely on humanitarian aid and state stipends. Officials stress that stabilizing the economy is directly tied to security: the fewer missile strikes on cities and the power grid, the faster normal life and economic activity can resume.
Russia’s Plans
Moscow continues to profess openness to negotiations, but without renouncing its strategic aims. The Kremlin reacted to Kyiv’s recent signals of willingness to talk by offering cautious approval tinged with conditions. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia views Zelenskyy’s stated openness to peace talks as a “positive” step, but he questioned the practicality of talks at this stage – noting that Zelenskyy is legally barred by his own decree from negotiating with President Vladimir Putin. “In general, the approach is positive, but the nuances have not yet changed: for the time being, there’s still a legal ban on the president of Ukraine negotiating with the Russian side,” Peskov emphasized. In essence, Moscow is hinting that real progress would require Kyiv to lift the October 2022 decree that forbids any talks with Putin’s regime. At the same time, the Kremlin continues its familiar narrative of blaming Ukraine for the lack of peace: earlier in the week, Peskov declared that “the Kyiv regime and Zelenskiy do not want peace. They want the war to continue,” saying that someone in the West “has to make Zelenskiy want peace.” According to Peskov, the public clash between Zelenskyy and Trump showed how difficult it will be to find a settlement and demonstrated, in his view, Zelenskyy’s “lack of diplomatic skills.” This rhetoric suggests Moscow is intent on portraying Ukraine as the reluctant party, even as it sets preconditions (like overturning the negotiation ban) for any future dialogue.
Додавайте "Україна Неймовірна" у свої джерела Google Новини
